Legal Opinion

Doherty v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In considering a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs and give them the benefit of all inferences which may fairly be drawn. The motion may be granted only if there is no rational process by which a jury could reach a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs (see, Akerman v City of New York, 226 AD2d 326; Kleinmunz v Katz, 190 AD2d 657). Applying that standard to this case, we agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dulin v. MaherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Kleinmunz v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Mulligan v. WetchlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. Akerman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frank v. NowickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API