Doherty v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In considering a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs and give them the benefit of all inferences which may fairly be drawn. The motion may be granted only if there is no rational process by which a jury could reach a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs (see, Akerman v City of New York, 226 AD2d 326; Kleinmunz v Katz, 190 AD2d 657). Applying that standard to this case, we agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dulin v. MaherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Kleinmunz v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Mulligan v. WetchlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Akerman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Frank v. NowickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000