Legal Opinion

Dulin v. Maher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1994PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), entered June 17, 1991, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the court did not err in ordering a bifurcated trial, as the plaintiffs failed to establish that the nature of the injuries suffered by the infant plaintiff was relevant to the issue of liability (see, Amato v Hudson Country Montessori School, 185 AD2d…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Cassano v. HagstromNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Selkowitz v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Sawyer v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Schechter v. KlanferNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Liebgott v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Berman v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Pilon v. PilonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Rothbard v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Stanford v. ReslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API