Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Lodzinski

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 30, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this case was filed to set aside two life insurance policies, — on the ground of misrepresentation or fraud in the applications therefor. This court, in and by its former final decree herein, set aside one of the policies, but held that complainant was barred from attacking the other policy, — under the limitation of the "incontestability" clause therein, and hence did not pass upon the question as to its voidability for fraud or misrepresentation. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v.Lodzinski, 121 N.J. Eq. 183. On cross-appeals, that decree was sustained as to the cancellation of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LodzinskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. LodzinskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SussmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. United Life, C., Ins. Co. v. WinnickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. SternNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  2. Knepp v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Knepp v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API