Legal Opinion
Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 30, 2008No. 5:08-cv-00014PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, Chief Judge.
Both the bankruptcy debtor, Brooks Lewis Musselman (“Musselman”), and the unsecured creditor, eCast Settlement Corporation (“eCast”), appeal from the order of the bankruptcy court entered November 30, 2007, confirming Musselman’s proposed Chapter 13 plan with requirement that it continue for a 5 year period. Appellate jurisdiction is vested in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). The issues presented, fully briefed and the subject of hearing, 1 are ripe for decision.
The issue framed on appeal by the debt- or is whether the bankruptcy court erred…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- In Re MeadowsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- In Re ScottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 2011
- In Re MooseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.