In Re Scott
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAURA K. GRANDY, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Chapter 13 Trustee’s objections to confirmation of plans offered by debtors Greg and Ka Sandra Scott and Marcus and Jacquelyn White and the objection to confirmation of the amended plan offered by debtors James and Laurie Shewmake (collectively “the debtors”). The basis of the Trustee’s objections, which is common to all three cases, is 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b). The Trustee objects that the debtors are not paying all of their projected disposable income to unsecured creditors under the proposed plans. For the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- In Re GuzmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re FredmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 2012
- In re JacksonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
- In re LopezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2017
- In re MontihoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- In re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.