Legal Opinion

Ketcham v. Oil Field Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1923No. 12428PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

This is an unlawful detainer action brought in the justice court of Tulsa county by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover possesssion of certain real estate located in the city of Tulsa. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and said cause was appealed to the district court of Tulsa county, where a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, from which the defendant brings error.

S. M. Gloyd owned certain real estate in .the city of Tulsa, and on February 14, 1914, made and entered into a lease contract with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McClelland v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Kozy Theatre Co. v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Dockery v. ThorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. American Cent. Ins. Co. of St. Louis v. SinclairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Yates v. American Republics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Fipps v. StidhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Wolf v. Tastee Freez Corporation of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Gruber v. CastleberryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Medomak Canning Co. v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API