Wolf v. Tastee Freez Corporation of America
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
This is an action for forcible detention. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment was sustained. Defendants appeal. The plaintiffs and appellees, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, are Samuel N. Wolf and Morris Shapiro. The defendants and appellants are Tastee Freez Corporation of America and Paul J. Rayer. They will hereinafter be referred to as defendants.
Defendants insist that a genuine issue of fact exists in connection with the asserted waiver by plaintiffs of the precise exercise of an option to extend a lease. Plaintiffs maintain there is no issue of fact and the questions involved…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bowman v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Fuchs v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- McClelland v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Khourie Bros. v. JonakinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Davenport Ltd. v. 75th & Dodge INebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Yankton Production Credit Ass'n v. LarsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Riley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Sosanie v. Pernetti Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Pearce v. Elic Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.