Pittman v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, Justice.
Certiorari was granted to review the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals as it pertains to the claim of a variance between the indictment and the evidence. 460 So.2d 232 (1984).
Under the following authorities, the decision on that point was not in error: Helms v. State, 270 Ala. 603, 121 So.2d 106 (1960); Jones v. State, 241 Ala. 337, 2 So.2d 422 (1941); McCoy v. State, 232 Ala. 104, 166 So. 769 (1936); Aaron v. State, 37 Ala. 106 (1861); Perry v. State, 465 So.2d 999 (Ala.Crim.App.1984); Gilbert v. State, 410 So.2d 473 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Huddleston v. State, 37…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
- Huddleston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Helms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Pittman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Ex Parte WillifordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Lundy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.