Legal Opinion

Pittman v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 8, 1985No. 83-1221PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

Certiorari was granted to review the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals as it pertains to the claim of a variance between the indictment and the evidence. 460 So.2d 232 (1984).

Under the following authorities, the decision on that point was not in error: Helms v. State, 270 Ala. 603, 121 So.2d 106 (1960); Jones v. State, 241 Ala. 337, 2 So.2d 422 (1941); McCoy v. State, 232 Ala. 104, 166 So. 769 (1936); Aaron v. State, 37 Ala. 106 (1861); Perry v. State, 465 So.2d 999 (Ala.Crim.App.1984); Gilbert v. State, 410 So.2d 473 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Huddleston v. State, 37…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  2. Huddleston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Helms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Pittman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Powe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Ex Parte WillifordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Lundy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API