Legal Opinion

Helms v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 26, 1960No. 8 Div. 41PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review and revise the opinion and judgment of the Court of Appeals in the case of Helms v. State.

The petition asserts error by the Court of Appeals in that it did not reverse the trial court for refusing to exclude the State’s evidence after it had rested its case, on the ground that there was a variance between the indictment and the proof in that the indictment charged that the person robbed was Frank Teal, while the proof showed that the person robbed bore the name of James Franklin Teal.

When there is no dispute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Cranford v. National Surety CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Hardie v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Langston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. ManascoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Donahay v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API