Legal Opinion

Hankerson v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 26, 2006No. A06-168PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant Dena Lyn Hankerson filed a petition for postconviction relief challenging her aggravated sentence because it was based on judicial fact finding in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). The postconviction court denied Hankerson’s request to vacate her sentence and impose the presumptive guideline sentence, but ordered a sentencing hearing in which it proposed to impanel a sentencing jury to resentence Hankerson under the authority of the 2005 legislative amendments to Minn.Stat. § 244.10, subd. 5(a). Hankerson…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ChauvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. Martinez-MendozaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API