Legal Opinion

Connor v. Hawkins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1888No. 2560PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Morris. Tried below before the Hon. S. P. Pounders, Special District Judge. The only question on this appeal is as to the title of appellee to a piano given her by her father in March, 1880. She became of age in September, 1880. The piano was levied on in August, 1883, under an execution based upon a judgment for an indebtedness from the father of plaintiff then insolvent. The facts shown in the findings of the court upon the issue are as follows.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Morris. Tried below before the Hon. S. P. Pounders, Special District Judge. The only question on this appeal is as to the title of appellee to a piano given her by her father in March, 1880. She became of age in September, 1880. The piano was levied on in August, 1883, under an execution based upon a judgment for an indebtedness from the father of plaintiff then insolvent. The facts shown in the findings of the court upon the issue are as follows. They are supported by the testimony: . “E. R. Hawkins bought the piano in St. Louis in March, 1880, and shipped it to Dangerfield,…

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

This is the third appeal in this case to this court. (64 Texas, 545; 66 Texas, 639.)

It is contended that to make out a defense under the statute of limitations in this case to bar the recovery of personal property, article 3207 Revised Statutes should be complied with. It provides: “Every action other than for the recovery of real estate, for which no limitation is otherwise prescribed, shall be brought within four years next after the right to bring the same shall have accrued, and not afterward.”

Sections 2 and 3, article 3203, Revised Statutes, do not differ from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tinnen v. MebaneTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Turner v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Conner v. HawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Thomas v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lightfoot v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Texas Water & Gas Co. Ex Rel. Bonner v. City of CleburneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
  3. O'Neill v. General Film Co.New York Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API