Legal Opinion

State v. Bice

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 1992No. 90CR1374FE; CA A68663 (Control); 90CR1375FE; CA A68664PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendants are charged with a number of drug related offenses, including manufacture of a controlled substance, marijuana. ORS 475.992(1). The state appeals pretrial orders suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The issue is whether the information in the affidavit, submitted to obtain the warrant, established probable cause to believe that the evidence would be at defendants’ residence.

Officer Paul, the affiant, swore in the affidavit that he had spoken to a “confidential reliable informant,” referred to as “A”:

“ ‘A’ told me a person by the name of ‘Cliff lives on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. LichtyOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. AranaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. SpriggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API