Legal Opinion

Borden v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 20, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

These are five actions of tort arising out of a railroad grade crossing collision on July 22, 1955, at Copicut Road, Freetown, between a motor vehicle operated by the plaintiff Christopher Borden (hereinafter, Borden) and a single self propelled Budd car of the defendant. The other plaintiffs are Charlotte Borden, wife of Christopher, Christina Borden, a minor child, and the administrators of the estates of two other minor children. Some counts were for common law negligence; others were brought under G. L. c. 160, §§ 138 and 232. These are the plaintiffs’ exceptions to the direction of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Hicks v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Duff v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Gaboriault v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Copithorn v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Town Taxi Inc. v. Police Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Boyd v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Nickerson v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Commonwealth v. BundzaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. May v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API