Legal Opinion

Nickerson v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 24, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

Florence Nickerson (hereinafter the plaintiff) and her husband had verdicts in the Superior Court in an action of tort for injuries sustained by the plaintiff, for consequential damages, and for damage to the husband’s automobile in a collision between the automobile and the defendant’s train of two Budd cars at the School Street crossing in Saugus on June 3, 1957, about 7 a.m. These are the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of a motion for directed verdicts and to parts of the charge.

'The locus is shown on the accompanying sketch adapted from a blueprint put in evidence by the defendant.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Slattery v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Hanks v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Murphy v. Boston and Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. Shwartz v. FeinbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. McCarthy v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marsden v. Eastern Gas & Fuel AssociatesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. Hultberg v. TruexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Scatena v. Pittsburgh & New England TruckingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. ShafferMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API