Legal Opinion

Duskin v. Carlson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 30, 1996No. 37005-7-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

An injured worker may sue a third party for damages under the industrial insurance third party action statute. Or the worker may assign the action to the Department of Labor and Industries. The action is automatically assigned if the worker does not answer the Department’s "written demand” to decide whether to sue. In this case, the Department wrote to Gordon Duskin, briefly describing third party actions, and advised him "(A) You may seek recovery yourself; or (B) you may ask Labor and Industries to consider seeking recovery for you.” This permissively worded letter did not tell Duskin that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maxey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mills v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. Ebsary v. Pioneer Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. In Re the Estate of BoettcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duskin v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Duskin v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Duskin v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API