In re Seattle Cut Glass Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Elaborate briefs were filed and many matters discussed which are not before the court. The issue is submitted upon the findings of the referee. After consideration of the briefs and the record before the court, I believe that the referee is right.
Section 1153 of Remington’s Code would have application if the funds were disposed of by the state court, but in this •court, under section 64b of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9648), the classification of claims and order of payment are fixed. In concluding between a state law and the Bankruptcy Act, as to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Crown Point Brush Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1912
- In re SlomkaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Dickinson v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904
- McDermott v. Tolt Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- In re McDavid Limber Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re SollarsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
- (PC) Pina v. YsusiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Thompson v. Garcia-FernandezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Civello v. Equinix, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Flynn v. MorgenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.