Legal Opinion

In re Sollars

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 22, 1932No. 32122PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

These matters are before the court on petitions for review. The same issue of law is involved in each ease. The facts with relation to the law are similar. The referee no doubt was inspired to his conclusion in the construction and application of the state law and Bankruptcy Act by expressions of this court in Re Seattle Cut Glass Co., 1 F.(2d) 409, 2 A. B. R. (N. S.) 352, which was predicated upon a different state of facts and relations. While in that case the claim was'made and filed under provisions of the laws of the state, no testimony was offered nor was it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re SlomkaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  2. Lemagie v. Acme Stamp WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ex parte BroussardSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Creditors Collection Ass'n v. BisbeeWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Manly v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re SollarsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API