Legal Opinion
Lunceford v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 21, 1925PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J._
It is conceded that the defendant is a foreign corporation, without process agent, property, or license to do business in this State. Service of summons is sought to be obtained under C. S., 1137, by leaving a true copy thereof with the Secretary of State and having him mail the copy to the president, secretary or other officer of the corporation, upon whom, if residing in this State, service could be made, it being alleged that the defendant is doing business in this State without complying with the provisions of said section.
The statute provides that every corporation having…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Suits v. Old Equity Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Denton v. . VassiliadesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Ruark v. Virginia Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Harrington v. Croft Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Ivy River Land & Timber Co. v. National Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.