Legal Opinion

People v. Lucas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1978No. Docket 60353PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue upon which this case is to be resolved is whether a person may be convicted of a crime as an aider and abettor on the basis that he was an "accessory after the fact”. We hold that such an accessory is not an aider and abettor under the statute 1 and that defendant Lucas’s conviction of burglary must be reversed.

At trial, the prosecution’s proofs tended to show that Lucas and a companion burglarized the home of Constance Harvell in Carleton (Monroe county). Mrs. Harvell returned home while the burglary was in progress. The burglars left the house while Mrs. Harvell was standing in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. WilbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Davis v. LaflerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. People v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Cathron v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  5. Johnathon Hopson v. Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API