Legal Opinion

Cathron v. Jones

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 15, 2002No. 2:00-cv-75347PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on petitioner Andre Cathron’s pro se habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court has concluded for the following reasons that the petition should be denied.

I. Background

In 1996, Petitioner and his co-defendant, Stephen Terry, were tried together. Terry was convicted of armed robbery, first-degree home invasion, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The jury was unable to reach a decision about Petitioner.

Petitioner was re-tried in 1997, and on January 31, 1997, a Genesee…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RenicoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. Cathron v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Brandon Michael Dupuis v. Kim CargorDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  4. Davis v. CheeksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  5. Denny Blanton, Jr. v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API