Legal Opinion
Diamantopulos v. Brookside Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 12, 1988No. Civ. H-87-75 (PCD)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff alleges that defendant refused to hire him in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. Defendant has moved for summary judgment.
Facts
From early 1984 to May 1986, plaintiff was employed at the Torin HVAC Division of Clevepak Corporation (“Torin”) as Director of Human Resources. Diamantopu-los Affidavit (“DA”), †1¶ 36, 57; Diamanto-pulos Deposition (“DD”) at 4-5. 1 He was responsible for the human resources functions of Torin’s various plants, including labor relations, salary…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adams v. New York State Education DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- LoSacco v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- O'SULLIVAN v. New York TimesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Moriarity v. United Technologies Corp. Represented Employees Retirement PlanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- O'BRYAN v. KTIV TelevisionDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.