Fulcher v. Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PeR CüRiam.
The cause o-f action stated is for an assault. The lease and plaintiff’s occupancy pursuant thereto merely -afforded an opportunity for an -assault. The forced abandonment of plaintiff’s property to escape defendant’s advances is but an element -of -damages. The action is -transitory, not local. Clay Co. v. Clay Co., 203 N.C. 12, *646164 S.E. 341; Causey v. Morris, 195 N.C. 532, 142 S.E. 783.
Affirmed.
MooRE, J., took no pant in -the consideration or decision of this case.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Causey v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Harris Clay Co. v. Carolina China Clay Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- In Re ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964