Legal Opinion
Washington Mutual Bank v. Law Office of Robert Jay Gumenick, P.C.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 11, 2008No. 08 Civ. 2154PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu”) brought this action against defendants Robert Jay Gumenick and the Law Office of Robert Jay Gumenick, P.C. (collectively, “Gumenick”) alleging legal malpractice, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty. Gumenick moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or, alternatively, for a stay pending resolution of related proceedings in the Superior Court of New Jersey and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (collectively, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Gregory v. DalyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Universal Gypsum of Georgia, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Regions Bank v. Wieder & Mastroianni, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Applestein v. KleinhendlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Steven Schweitzer and William Scott Mero v. James E. Nevels and The Swarthmore Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026