Legal Opinion

Cisneros v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 28, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

This suit was brought under the Arizona Civil Rights Act, A.R.S. § 41-1461 et seq., with appellant alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of sex. The trial court awarded judgment for the employer-appellee. The issue on appeal is whether appellant established a prima facie case of discrimination and if so whether employer rebutted such. We affirm.

At the onset we recognize that this court will not substitute its judgment for that of a trial court in determining whether there is sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s judgment. Desruisseau v. Isley, 27…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sees v. KTUC, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Civil Rights Division of Arizona Department of Law v. Amphitheater Unified School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Alyssa E. Nessel v. JDM Golf LLC, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  5. Wentzel v. Williams Scotsman IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API