Legal Opinion

Wentzel v. Williams Scotsman Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 10, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02101Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Elaine Wentzel, No. CV-18-02101-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Williams Scotsman Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant Williams Scotsman Incorporated’s Motion 16 for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 80, “Mot.”). Plaintiff Elaine Wentzel responded, (Doc. 87, 17 “Resp.”), and Defendant replied, (Doc. 90, “Reply”). Both parties filed separate statements 18 of facts with multiple exhibits. (Doc. 81, “DSOF”; Doc. 86, “PSOF”). The Court has 19 considered the pleadings and viewed the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API