Kenneth Leventhal & Co. v. Reeves
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1DissentAmidei, Justice
I respectfully dissent.
Reeve’s petition alleged two causes of action, one, for declaratory judgment, and the second, for breach of contract. The trial court, after a bench trial, entered judgment for Reeves on the merits, and awarded him attorneys fees against Leventhal and Finn. There were no findings of fact and conclusions of law, nor did the judgment indicate which cause of action Reeves prevailed upon. Since no damages were awarded Reeves on the breach of contract action, we must presume the trial court held for Reeves on his declaratory judgment action. The presumptions in such a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- One Call Systems, Inc. v. Houston Lighting & Power, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- Spawglass Construction Corp. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Calvert v. Employees Retirement System of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- International & Great Northern Railroad v. CuneoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.