Legal Opinion
Provencal v. Parker
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1976No. Docket 21473, 21474PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBashara, J.
This is an appeal arising out of an automobile negligence action. The facts appear to be confusing because of the number of parties involved.
On February 20, 1969 the fourth party defendant, Samuel Parker [hereinafter referred to as Samuel], borrowed a car owned by his son to drive to work. The son was the original defendant, Robert Parker [hereinafter referred to as defendant]. Samuel was employed as a painter by the third party defendant, Arthur Rohn, Jr. [hereinafter referred to as the employer].
At work the employer directed Samuel to proceed to another painting job. Samuel went to his car…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Husted v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Dale v. WhitemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Nanasi v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Boucher v. ThomsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hill v. Sullivan Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Peeples v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Minster MacHine Co. v. Diamond Stamping Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Langley v. Harris Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Warren v. McLouth Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.