Legal Opinion

County of Hennepin v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 24, 1978No. 47426PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

On stipulated facts and exhibits the district court granted Hennepin County judgment declaring that neither the county nor a joint venture known as PMS were liable for Minnesota sales and use tax on raw steel which was sold by a supplier to PMS, fabricated by PMS, and incorporated into the Hennepin County Government Center. We reverse and hold that the sale of the raw steel to PMS was a taxable retail sale under Minn.St. 297A.01, subd. 4, which provides that “[sjales of building materials, supplies and equipment to * * * contractors, subcontractors or builders for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moorhead v. GrassleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Duluth Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Royal Plastics, Inc.'s Request for Refund of State & Municipal Sales & Use TaxesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Sterling Custom Homes Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Zimpro, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Belline v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API