County of Hennepin v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
On stipulated facts and exhibits the district court granted Hennepin County judgment declaring that neither the county nor a joint venture known as PMS were liable for Minnesota sales and use tax on raw steel which was sold by a supplier to PMS, fabricated by PMS, and incorporated into the Hennepin County Government Center. We reverse and hold that the sale of the raw steel to PMS was a taxable retail sale under Minn.St. 297A.01, subd. 4, which provides that “[sjales of building materials, supplies and equipment to * * * contractors, subcontractors or builders for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moorhead v. GrassleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Duluth Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Royal Plastics, Inc.'s Request for Refund of State & Municipal Sales & Use TaxesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Sterling Custom Homes Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Bituminous Roadways, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Zimpro, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Belline v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.