Legal Opinion

Conforti v. Central School District No. 3 of Lloyd, Marlboro, New Paltz & Esopus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, made at a Trial Term for Ulster County, which granted a motion made by the defendants-respondents for a physical examination of the infant plaintiff. Appellants urge that defendants-respondents failed to present satisfactory evidence to' justify a second physical examination under section 306 of the Civil Practice Act. The infant plaintiff had voluntarily submitted to one examination. We think the moving papers set forth sufficient reasons for a second examination, and moreover the statute expresses no limitation on the number of examinations…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Orlando v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Benedict v. MisenerNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lane v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Swiatlowski v. KasprzykNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. MacLarty v. LortzNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Muscolino v. Protective Loan Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API