Legal Opinion

Lane v. Hunt

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Robert Lynch, J.

The defendants move for a physical examination of the plaintiff who states that he has already been examined on their behalf and will not consent to another unless it is done in the presence of one of his own doctors with the report being furnished his attorney.

Section 306 of the Civil Practice Act authorizes the court to direct a physical examination of the plaintiff where ‘ ‘ the defendant shall present to the court satisfactory evidence that he is ignorant of the nature and extent of the injuries complained of ”. The statute does not limit the number of examinations to which the plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conforti v. Central School District No. 3 of Lloyd, Marlboro, New Paltz & EsopusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Anthony v. BradshawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muscolino v. Protective Loan Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Strobel v. Mac Dave Oil Burner Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1968
  3. Strobel v. Mac Dave Oil Burner Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API