Legal Opinion

The Federal Rubber Co. v. Pruett

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1940No. Civil No. 4043PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The Federal Rubber Company commenced this action against Super Service, Inc., for the sum of $1,546.19, balance due for goods sold to it, and against Myrtle E. Pruett, guarantor of such account.

At the close of the case, on motion of plaintiff, the court directed a verdict against Super Service, Inc., for the full amount of the claim. The question of Pruett’s liability on her guaranty was submitted to the jury and the jury returned a verdict in her favor.

The plaintiff has appealed and assigns as errors the court’s refusal to direct a verdict in its favor against defendant Pruett, and its…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pink v. BuschNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. K-Line Builders v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Tucson Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Aetna Investment Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Alexander v. O'NEILArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cavanagh v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API