Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1941No. 9081Published

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

After verdict for plaintiffs, the defendant has moved for judgment in its favor upon its motion to that effect made at the trial and reserved by the court, or, in the alternative, for a new trial.

On April 26, 1933, one of the plaintiffs, P. W. Matthews, a mechanical engineer, applied for a patent for a four-high rolling mill, and on October 6, 1936, the patent was granted. On February 26, 1934, he applied for a patent on a flying shear which was granted on February 9, 1937. Prior to. any approach of Matthews to the defendant, interests in the applications had been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API