Legal Opinion
General Paint Corporation v. Kramer
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1933No. 845PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
On August 26, 1929, Kramer executed and delivered to the General Paint Corporation three written assignments by which he transferred to it his rights in three certain inventions for improvements to a pipe wrapping machine and the patent rights therefor, described as “Coupling for Pipe Wrapping Machine,” “Dolly and Return Trackway,” and “Protecting Sleeve.” Each of these assignments recited a consideration of one dollar.
Kramer brought an action against the Paint Corporation upon an alleged contract of employment for his lifetime, entered into as a further consideration…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Parkersburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oliver v. Rumford Chemical WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Troutman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Deutser v. Marlboro Shirt Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Carter Coal Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Consolidated Products Co. v. Blue Valley Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.