Legal Opinion

Fay v. Cox

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1920No. Civ. No. 2100PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. W. H. Langdon, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

Plaintiff and defendant owned and occupied adjoining tracts of land in Stanislaus County. On the morning of June 7, 1916, a fire started on the ranch of defendant, subsequently spreading to that of plaintiff on the south, and destroyed about 150 acres of standing ripened barley, which plaintiff alleged was of the value of $4,464. Plaintiff claimed that defendant, by reason of his negligence, was responsible for this destruction of the grain. The theory of the contention is found in the following allegation of the complaint: “That on the seventh day of June, 1916, the defendant above named was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Grossetti v. SweaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Lester v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Sampson v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Miller v. Pacific Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Oles v. Kahn Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Dibble v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API