Legal Opinion

State v. Sandoval

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 31, 2018No. 113299Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 113,299 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ERNEST E. SANDOVAL, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT After revoking a criminal defendant's probation, a district judge may choose to sentence anew, even if some component of the original sentence was illegal because it failed to match a mandatory statutory minimum. In the alternative, a judge may simply require the defendant to serve the original sentence. If a new sentence is pronounced from the bench after probation revocation, any original illegality no longer exists, and the new sentence is not subject…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. Abasolo v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. LooneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. BallardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API