Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. Kung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted in part and cross motion granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant Arnot-Ogden Medical Center (Medical Center) and the cross motion of defendants Kung and Hutsal for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 511 (b). Plaintiffs commenced this action in Monroe County, where none of the parties resides. That was improper (see, CPLR 503 [a]; Peretzman v Elias, 221 AD2d 192), and plaintiffs thereby forfeited their right to designate *989venue (see, Kirschner v Cusa, 211 AD2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Kaplan v. Waldbaum's Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Bruder v. Pepsi Cola, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Peretzman v. EliasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Kirschner v. CusaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harvard Steel Sales, LLC v. BainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API