Legal Opinion

Peretzman v. Elias

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered on or about February 3, 1995, which granted defendant’s motion to change of venue of this action to Nassau County pursuant to CPLR 511 (b), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to CPLR 503 (a), the place of trial shall be in the county in which one of the parties resided when the action commenced (Berberich v York Scaffold Equip. Corp., 177 AD2d 451). Here, there is no question that New York County is not a proper county since none of the parties resided therein at the time of the commencement of the action.

"While a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Philogene v. Fuller Auto LeasingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Roman v. BreretonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Berberich v. York Scaffold Equipment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leopold v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Brash v. RichardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Accardi v. KaufmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Hoskins v. KungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API