Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Golightly

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 16, 1985No. 22425Published

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

This case involves an action for indemnification. The Circuit Court ordered certain defenses stricken on the ground they are irrelevant. We affirm.

FACTS

Grover Golightly, a home builder, applied to Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) for a $10,000 license bond. The bond was required to be given to the South Carolina Residential Home Builders Commission (RHBC) by S. C. Code Ann. § 40-59-70 (1976).

The application required Golightly to indemnify Aetna for any losses incurred on the bond. The bond was expressly conditioned upon Golightly’s compliance with RHBC rules and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Culbreth v. Britt Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Olympic Radio & Television, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API