Legal Opinion

In re Lam Jung Sing

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided February 1, 1907Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

In this proceeding under the Chinese exclusion act depositions de bene esse were taken by the defendant. The United States objects to the testimony on the ground that the proceeding is statutory and the court has not the power to consider such testimony. I think section 863 of the Revised Statutes of the United States is broad enough to permit the reading of the depositions [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 661]. The decisions have frequently held that proceedings under the Chinese exclusion act are not criminal in their nature, and such proceedings have been regarded as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. United States v. Hom HingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1892
  4. Wallace v. Arkansas Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API