Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Kelley

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided October 10, 2002No. 13-01-533-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice DORSEY.

William Steed Kelley appeals pro se from an order denying habeas corpus relief. Kelley allegedly damaged State property while incarcerated at the McConnell Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”). As a result of this conduct, the TDCJ left Kelley in “line class 3” 1 for one year, placed cell restrictions on him in administrative segregation for three days, 2 and assessed a restitution cost of $1,984.97. Afterwards Kelley was indicted for criminal mischief, based upon the same facts which led to his disciplinary sanctions. Kelley filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ex Parte BroxtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Rogers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ortega v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  2. Reidie James Jackson v. Oliver Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
  3. Robert Lee Ortega v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  4. Rutilio Fuentes, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API