Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Broxton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1994No. 1394-93PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

Appellant brings this petition for discretionary review from the appeal of the denial of his pretrial writ of habeas corpus. The question presented on appeal was whether the use of an unadjudicated extraneous offense as evidence in the punishment phase of a capital murder trial, where the death penalty was assessed, barred the subsequent prosecution of that offense under the double jeopardy clauses of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I Section 14 of the Texas Constitution. The court of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Sunbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Murray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  4. Tharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Clarke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API