Legal Opinion
Blau v. Lehman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 22, 1959PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is an action based upon § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78p(b), 1 in which plaintiff, a shareholder of defendant Tide Water Associated Oil Company (hereinafter called “Tide Water”), seeks an accounting by defendants other than Tide Water of certain profits realized from alleged purchases and sales of securities within a period of less than six months.
This action was tried by the Court without a jury and the following are the findings of fact of the Court:
At all material times the securities of defendant Tide Water were registered on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Gratz v. ClaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blau v. LehmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Judith S. Feder v. Martin Marietta Corporation and Sperry Rand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co. v. AndreasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Blau v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.