Legal Opinion

Judith S. Feder v. Martin Marietta Corporation and Sperry Rand Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 14, 1969No. 33, Docket 32159PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant, a stockholder of the Sperry Rand Corporation (“Sperry”) after having made the requisite demand upon Sperry which was not complied with, commenced this action pursuant to § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b) (1964), to recover for Sperry “short-swing” profits realized upon Sperry stock purchases and sales by the Martin Marietta Corporation (“Martin”). 1 Plaintiff alleged that George M. Bunker, the President and Chief Executive of Martin Marietta, was deputized by, or represented, Martin Marietta when he served as a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Blau v. LehmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Guzman v. PichiriloSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Gratz v. ClaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Reliance Electric Co. v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Mendell ex rel. Viacom Inc. v. GollustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API