Legal Opinion
Broyles v. Synercon Corp.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McCanless, justice.
This case involves construction of the defendant’s stock option plan in order to determine the extent to which the plaintiff employee could exercise his option following the termination of his employment. The Chancery Court of Davidson County held that the plaintiff, Keith Broyles, could not exercise the full option following his resignation. The plaintiff has appealed directly to this Court.
The plaintiff, Broyles, was director of office services, personnel, and purchasing *289for Forrest Life Insurance Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the defendant Synercon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commerce Street Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Dearing v. Brush Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- H. Dodge Freeman v. Copper Range CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Lutzker v. Walter E. Heller & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dixon v. Pro Image Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
- John L. Schwieger and Dwayne Vande Stouwe v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- John L. Schwieger and Dwayne Vande Stouwe v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Kurt Seraphine v. Aqua BathCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Quinn v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997