Quinn v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this case, including entry of final judgment. Both parties have moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion is denied, and defendant’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
On September 14, 1996, plaintiff filed a summons and complaint in New York State Supreme Court seeking money damages in the amount of $94,627.00 as the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Hunt Ltd. v. Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.