Farr Company, a Corporation v. American Air Filter Company, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves United States Letters Patent No. 2,807,330, issued to plaintiff, American Air Filter Company, assignee of Richard D. Rivers, the inventor.
In this opinion the parties will be referred to by their designations in the District Court. Plaintiff brought this .action for infringement against the Farr Company, seeking damages and an injunction. Defendant urged as defenses anticipation and lack of invention, as well as overclaim and indefiniteness and uncertainty of the patent claims. Judgment went for the plaintiff and defendant has appealed. We conclude…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kwikset Locks, Inc. v. Hillgren. Hillgren v. Kwikset Locks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- McCord Corp. v. Beacon Auto Radiator Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Laurent Regimbal v. Peter Scymansky, Laurent Regimbal v. Lloyd Brulotte, Laurent Regimbal v. Melvin J. NewhouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- SSP Agricultural Equipment, Inc. v. Orchard-Rite Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Continental Connector Corporation, a Corporation v. Houston Fearless Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Canadian Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Peterson Products of San Mateo, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.