Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Greidanus

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 17, 1932Published

1Per curiam

The appeal in this case was dismissed (157 Atl. Rep. 384; 9 N. J. Mis. R. 1340), but was reinstated and is now before us on the merits.

There are six grounds of appeal but only the first and second point to any judicial ruling. The others are therefore disregarded.

Grounds 1 and 2 are that the court erred in refusing to nonsuit and erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. The crucial question involved is whether the infant plaintiff was in the place where he was injured by invitation. If not, the defendant owed him no duty of care and, consequently, questions of negligence are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ReichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  2. Turess v. New York, Susquehanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  3. Harrington v. GreidanusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  4. Herbert v. Newark Hardware & Supply Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API