Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Greidanus

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 8, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Rule 141 of this court provides that on all appeals taken the statement of the case submitted to the court shall include,, among other matters, the record of the case. It hardly seems necessary to state that a judgment which is sought to be reviewed must appear as a part of that record. An examination of the statement of the case submitted to the court on this appeal fails to disclose that any judgment was ever-entered in the Circuit Court. Unless the record of the alleged judgment is included in the statement of the case submitted upon the appeal, the court cannot either affirm or reverse…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meisel v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waat Program Service, Inc. v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  2. Harrington v. GreidanusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API