Autrey v. Latta

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill was not multifarious. Lowery v. May, 213 Ala. 66, 104 So. 5; Henry v. Ide, 208 Ala. 33, 93 So. 860; Gill v. More, et al., 200 Ala. 511, 76 So. 453.

There was a cross-appeal and respective assignments of error, challenging the action of the trial court in rendering a final decree in eqjiity.

It is charged in the bill that J. W. Martin and Luther Latta and his wife wrongfully and fraudulently conspired to defeat complainant in collecting any judgment that she might obtain against Latta and Martin, and, for the fraudulent purpose of carrying out such scheme, the mortgage…