Baldwin Township's Annexation
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
This ease was certified to us by the Superior Court in pursuance of the Act of 1895, P. L. 212. That court held that in a proceeding for the annexation of part of a township to a contiguous city under the Act of April 28,1903, P. L. 332, amended by the Act of April 7,1927, P. L. 161, though a majority of the township electors voted for annexation, an annexation decree by the court of quarter sessions was not lawfully made when the state council of education disapproved in writing of that annexation.
The township challenges the constitutionality of the act making as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- O'Neil v. Am. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Baldwin v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
3Cited by36 opinions
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Life FellowshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- American Baseball Club v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- English v. Robinson Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.